Nancy and Jerry Ackermann have been strip-tilling corn and no-tilling soybeans and alfalfa on their 1,200-acre farm in southwest Minnesota for 15 years. Coming from conventional tillage practices, the transition began on a small 50-acre test plot.

“We were getting started right around the same time our co-op was using the new AGCO variable-rate spreaders,” says Jerry. “We had a friend mention that we ought to try strip-till that year too, so we tested both.”

Both strip-till and variable-rate showed an 8- to 9-bushel corn yield advantage. But the Ackermanns ran the tests again over the next few years and found that while they both increase yield, variable-rate technology was costing them $15-$18 more per acre in fertilizer when they followed the recommendations.

At the time, the Ackermanns decided to suspend variable-rate spreading but continue with strip-till, which was paying an immediate dividend.

“The first year we implemented strip-till across 100% of our corn and no-till on our soybeans and alfalfa, we cut our fuel bill in half,” Jerry says. “At the time variable-rate spreading wasn’t worth it, but now variable-rate application through the strip-till rig is available, which has been working great for us for the past 3 years or so.”

Custom Savings

In addition to fuel savings, the Ackermanns also saw an economic advantage to hiring out their strip-till compared to conventional tillage.

“We had to look at it from the economics of it,” Jerry says.

no_difference_1-2.jpg no_difference_2-2.jpg

NO DIFFERENCE. Since they have their acres custom strip-tilled, the Ackermanns have had different machines with different numbers of row units running across their fields. They’ve paid careful attention to whether one brand builds better strips than others, but at harvest they’ve seen little to no difference in corn yields between them.

Iowa State University puts out average custom rates for the Midwest and Jerry’s quoted them. Straight chisel plowing is $16 per acre for one pass, hiring the co-op to spread their fertilizer would cost $8.50 per acre and one pass with the field cultivator would cost another $14 per acre.

“That’s already $38.50 per acre,” he says. “I’m paying the co-op $20 per acre to have a strip-till pass done and then I’m ready to plant, so I’m ahead of the game already by $18.50 per acre.

“I think we’re going to see more people turning to strip-till just simply because of the tight margins we have now.”

The byproduct of having so many acres custom strip-tilled is having to make use of a mix of different machines with different row counts running, sometimes at the same time, across the field. However, the Ackermanns say that with the adjustability of newer rigs and RTK to match the strips tightly to their planter, it’s become less of an issue each year.

“The two nearby co-ops have 24-row rigs and among nearby farmers, there are three 12-rows, a 16-row and a 6-row and a variety of brands,” Jerry says. “They can all run at different depths too, but we have everyone adjust to 6-8 inches on our farm. We’ve watched carefully to see if one brand builds better strips, and to be honest, at harvest we’ve seen little to no difference between the brands.”

Another reality of running several different rigs is keeping all the fields on the same page as far as fertilizer is concerned. This, however, has become a sort of personal crusade for the Ackermanns, who’ve had a lot of success lowering their rates over the past few years.

“Originally we used anhydrous in the fall, but we had some dry falls and wet winters, so we felt like we were losing too much,” Jerry says. “The co-op would just say to put on another 30 pounds because it was still cheaper than changing the product. Eventually we had to stop and ask ourselves why we were wasting so much. Plus, I think we’re all going to be held more accountable for the nitrogen (N) that leaches off our farm very soon.”

Push for Less ‘N’

When the Ackermanns first decided to switch N products, they transitioned to urea with a stabilizer banded 6 inches deep. Over time, their system evolved further to include ESN Smart Nitrogen in a split application.

“Instead of putting all our N on in the fall, now we put down 30-40 pounds of variable-rated urea with a stabilizer and ESN, plus our sulfur, phosphorus and potash. All of the rates are based on grid sampling,” Jerry says. “The ESN is more expensive, but our tests show that we see a lot less leaching. Then in the spring, we put on another 5 gallons per acre of 10-43-0 with zinc, in-furrow during planting and a final application of 32% N at sidedress during V4-V6 stage.”


DRINKING UP ‘N.’ Minnesota no-till and strip-till farmers Nancy and Jerry Ackermann have found that by using cover crops, they can continue to dial back their nitrogen rates. They prefer to interseed their cereal rye, radishes and annual ryegrass into corn shortly after sidedressing.

The Ackermanns feel strongly that because of the advantageous fertility placement that strip-till has offered them, they’ve been able to dial down their rates significantly. They are hoping to soon be able to consistently produce 200 bushels of corn per acre on 140 pounds of N.

“When we still used anhydrous, we went by the old rule of thumb: 1-1¼ pounds per bushel,” Jerry says. “Then, of course, the recommendation to add an extra 30 pounds because you were sure to lose some over the winter.

“Now because of the better products, strip-till placement and split applications, we’ve been able to bring it down close to our goal of 140 pounds per acre while still maintaining an average of 190 bushels per acre. With the way things are going, cover crops may help us bring it down even further.”

Cover Crop Advantage

During the past 3 years, the Ackermanns have been implementing large-scale cover crop experiments to grab any extra N that may be leaching. After testing a variety of application methods — including airplane seeding, helicopter and drilling after harvest — they’ve determined that interseeding works best for their operation.

“Using a helicopter is nice because you can land right on the road and fill it up, but it’s expensive,” says Jerry. “Drilling after harvest is nice too, but in our area we just really don’t see enough growth that late to make it worth it.

“We interseed shortly after sidedressing now, and it works really well. We’ve tried cereal rye and radishes and like them for their ability to scavenge up any leftover N, and we’ve also seen annual rye work really well in corn, because it can handle growing in the shade of the corn as it gets taller.”

As an added bonus to retaining N, recent tests with his local watershed have also revealed that the combination of strip-till and cover cropping is having a positive effect on the Ackermanns’ water infiltration rates and a reduction in ponding.

“EPA-funded tests through our watershed showed that my soil could take 8 inches of rain in an hour before it started ponding,” Jerry says. “That was backed up too when we got 6 inches of rain over a few days and nearby farms still using conventional tillage had huge ponds. It went straight into our soil, even where we’d had trucks drive in and out of the field.”


Issue Contents