A new USDA study shows that farmers using combinations of erosion-control and nutrient-management practices on cultivated cropland are reducing losses of sediment, nitrogen and phosphorous from farm fields and decreasing the movement of these materials to the Great Lakes and their associated waterways.
"The Great Lakes Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) study confirms that good conservation planning and implementation have reduced loadings of sediment and nutrients to waterways throughout the region," Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack says. "The Administration appreciates the actions of every farmer who is stepping up to implement conservation practices, protect vital farmlands and strengthen local economies. At the same time, we also see opportunities for even further progress."
The CEAP study, prepared by USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, estimates that the use of conservation-tillage and other conservation practices has resulted in a 50% decline in sediment entering rivers and streams, along with 36% and 37% declines, respectively, in phosphorus and nitrogen loading.
This latest study, as with CEAP reports on the Upper Mississippi River Basin and the Chesapeake Bay watershed, identifies slightly more than half of cropland as having either a high or moderate need for additional conservation practices to lessen sediment and nutrient losses. The remainder of cropland has low needs for additional conservation — that is, low vulnerabilities to sediment and/or nutrient loss and having adequate conservation management to minimize losses.
The study covers nearly 174,000 square miles — the entire U.S. side of the Great Lakes Region, including nearly all of Michigan and parts of Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
It's based on data obtained through a survey of farming and conservation practices conducted by USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service from 2003 to 2006. More than 1,400 National Resources Inventory sample points provide the statistical basis for estimating conditions throughout the region.
You can read additional information about the Great Lakes Conservation Effects Assessment Project study here.