In this edition:

• No Safe Bets – Supreme Court Glyphosate Case Seen Too Close to Call
• Chemical Collision: The Pesticide Provisions that Nearly Derailed the House Bill
• Supreme Court Grills Bayer Over Failure to Warn Consumers About Roundup Risks

In this edition:

• U.S. House Passes Farm Bill 2.0, Pesticide ‘Liability Shield’ Removed
• ‘Fuming’ MAHA diehards point blame at Trump admin with movement set to ‘implode’
• Effective weed control crucial for agriculture in Africa
• Does herbicide spraying impact drinking water?

In this edition:

• The silver bullet that wasn’t: Glyphosate’s declining weed control over 25 years
• How Safe Is Glyphosate Chemical Backed by Trump? What the Science Says
• Glyphosate resistance is not inevitable: changes you can make
• Scientists Say This Potential Carcinogen May Be Lurking in Your Garden

In this edition:

• Monsanto announces Roundup class settlement agreement to resolve current and future claims
• Trump Signs Order Protecting Glyphosate, Phosphorus Production
• Kennedy defends Trump glyphosate order; MAHA erupts as midterms approach
• Roundup’s Long-Standing Safety Claims Are Being Reexamined After ‘Serious Ethical Concerns’ Emerge

In this edition:

• Supreme Court agrees to review Bayer’s request to block lawsuits claiming federally-approved herbicide glyphosate causes cancer
• The Glyphosate Problem in Regenerative Agriculture
• Finding the good in glyphosate

In this edition:

• The Clock Is Ticking for Glyphosate: Decisions from Supreme Court, EPA, and State Legislatures Expected in 2026
• The Glyphosate Elephant in the Regen Room
• Outrage at European Science Center as Director Ousted After Study on Glyphosate

In this edition:

• Bayer sues AIG Insurance to help with legal bills as Roundup claims top $10 billion
• European Union Commission Seeks Indefinite Approval for Glyphosate
• Australian flower growers see ‘red’ over federal government proposal to relax imported flower rules

SCOTUS considered Bayer’s petition for writ of certiorari earlier this year but asked Solicitor General D. John Sauer for additional input on the case, Monsanto Co. vs. John L. Durnell.

In this edition:

• Draft MAHA Report Embraces Conservation Agriculture, Doesn’t Target Pesticides
• The Impact of a Ghostwritten Paper on the Fate of Glyphosate
• Greenpeace Misleading People on Glyphosate
• More Potential Cases of Glyphosate Resistance Found in Italian Ryegrass

Essentially, SCOTUS is asking for the government's perspective on whether federal pesticide law, including Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, preempts state-level lawsuits alleging failure to warn about the product's potential health risks.