Get full access NOW to the most comprehensive, powerful and easy-to-use online resource for no-tillage practices. Just one good idea will pay for your subscription hundreds of times over.
No-tillers have known for years that there are dozens of reasons for moving away from intensive tillage. With today’s sky-rocketing fuel prices, one of the most obvious is the tremendous fuel cost savings with no-till
It’s no surprise to hear that practically everyone around the world seems to be taking a hit from higher fuel prices. Yet few can find more dramatic savings than farmers shifting more acres to no-till.
Relying on fuel consumption data from a number of years ago that was published in No-Till Farmer, our editors recently compared conventional tillage, minimum tillage and no-tillage systems. Besides tillage and planting, our comparison also included harvest and two trips with a sprayer.
In this analysis, conventional tillage required 8.09 gallons per acre of diesel fuel compared to 5.6 gallons for minimum tillage and only 3.93 gallons for no-till.
Based on a farm size of 1,365 acres (the average in No-Till Farmer’s 2022 No-Till Operational Benchmark Study), we calculated the total needs for diesel fuel for various tillage systems.
It averaged 5,364 gallons for no-till, 7,644 gallons for minimum tillage and 11,043 gallons for growers still doing conventional tillage.
Based on the May 2022 average U.S. No. 2 diesel retail price of $5.57 per gallon, this adds up to yearly fuel costs of $28,735 for no-tillers, $42,577 for growers using minimum tillage and $61,510 for growers doing conventional tillage. The fuel savings between conventional tillage and no-tillage in a 1,365-acre operation is $32,775 in favor…