In this edition:

• The silver bullet that wasn’t: Glyphosate’s declining weed control over 25 years
• How Safe Is Glyphosate Chemical Backed by Trump? What the Science Says
• Glyphosate resistance is not inevitable: changes you can make
• Scientists Say This Potential Carcinogen May Be Lurking in Your Garden

In this edition:

• Supreme Court agrees to review Bayer’s request to block lawsuits claiming federally-approved herbicide glyphosate causes cancer
• The Glyphosate Problem in Regenerative Agriculture
• Finding the good in glyphosate

In this edition:

• The Clock Is Ticking for Glyphosate: Decisions from Supreme Court, EPA, and State Legislatures Expected in 2026
• The Glyphosate Elephant in the Regen Room
• Outrage at European Science Center as Director Ousted After Study on Glyphosate

SCOTUS considered Bayer’s petition for writ of certiorari earlier this year but asked Solicitor General D. John Sauer for additional input on the case, Monsanto Co. vs. John L. Durnell.

Essentially, SCOTUS is asking for the government's perspective on whether federal pesticide law, including Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, preempts state-level lawsuits alleging failure to warn about the product's potential health risks.